Loading page...
Loading page...
Selecting a media agency is one of the highest-stakes commercial decisions a marketing leader will make. Your media agency will control or influence how tens of millions of pounds of advertising budget is invested, shape your brand’s presence in the market, and operate deep inside your commercial data and strategic plans. Getting this decision right — or wrong — has consequences that persist for years.
Agency relationships are typically governed by three to five year contracts. A poor appointment is not simply an underperforming vendor relationship that can be switched with minimal friction — it involves a complex and disruptive transition, potential commercial disputes, continuity gaps in live campaigns, and the cost and distraction of running another pitch within years of the last one.
Typical annual media investment governed by the agency relationship
Average contract length — making the right choice from the outset critical
Of poorly managed pitches result in a relationship change within 18 months
A well-run pitch is not simply a procurement exercise. Done properly, it is an opportunity to define what you need from a media agency, understand the full range of options in the market, test agency thinking against your real business challenges, and establish a commercial framework for a productive long-term partnership. The pitch process itself, if well-designed, generates strategic value beyond just agency selection.
Not every situation warrants a full pitch. There are specific triggers that indicate a competitive review is the right course of action, and others where a performance review, audit, or renegotiation may be more appropriate.
The most straightforward trigger. If your agency contract is approaching expiry, a competitive pitch ensures you are not simply rolling over on autopilot into a potentially unfavourable arrangement. Even if you intend to remain with the incumbent, a pitch provides leverage and market validation.
If your agency has consistently underdelivered against agreed KPIs, failed to respond to feedback, or produced strategic thinking that no longer meets your needs, a pitch signals the seriousness of the situation and opens up your options.
A major shift in business strategy — entering new markets, a significant acquisition, a rebranding, or a fundamental change in target audience — may require agency capabilities that differ from those that served you previously.
If you need to significantly reduce agency fees, restructure the commercial model, or move to an in-house/hybrid model, a pitch is often more effective than attempting to renegotiate unilaterally with the incumbent.
If the agency team that won your business has largely moved on, or if the agency has undergone significant ownership or structural changes that affect your confidence, a review may be warranted.
Sometimes a pitch is not driven by dissatisfaction but by a genuine desire to understand what is available in the market and whether your current arrangements remain competitive. A market review every four to five years is good governance.
A well-structured pitch follows eight distinct phases. Each phase has a specific purpose and outputs. Skipping or compressing phases is the most common source of pitch problems.
Before approaching any agency, invest time in defining what you actually need. This means agreeing your media objectives, scope of services (planning, buying, or both), channel requirements, key performance indicators, team structure expectations, and budget range for agency fees.
Draw up a longlist of eight to twelve agencies that could plausibly meet your requirements. Use your own market knowledge, independent research, industry databases, and — if using a pitch consultant — their agency intelligence. Consider scale, specialist capability, culture, and conflict of interest (e.g. existing client conflicts).
A Request for Information is a shorter document than the full RFP, designed to qualify agencies before the more intensive pitch stage. It should cover agency credentials, relevant case studies, team structure, commercial model, and initial response to a headline brief. Keep it concise — agencies receive many RFIs and over-long documents depress response quality.
Evaluate RFI responses against your pre-agreed criteria and reduce the field to three to five agencies for the full pitch. Communicate the outcome professionally to all agencies — both those progressing and those not proceeding. The way you run this process reflects on your business and affects your ability to attract strong responses in future.
The Request for Proposal is the centrepiece of the pitch. It should contain a detailed brief covering your business context, media objectives, current situation, data and technology landscape, team expectations, fee structure preferences, and evaluation criteria. Allow agencies a minimum of three to four weeks to respond — shorter timeframes produce lower-quality responses.
Before the formal pitch presentations, hold chemistry meetings with each shortlisted agency. These 60–90 minute sessions allow you to assess team dynamics, cultural fit, and ways of working — factors that are difficult to evaluate from written documents but are critical to a successful long-term relationship. Chemistry meetings also allow agencies to ask questions that will improve their pitch quality.
Pitch presentations should be structured, consistent, and allow adequate time for strategic thinking to be demonstrated. We recommend a half-day format with a structured agenda, consistent questions across all agencies, and a scoring panel that includes both marketing and commercial stakeholders. Avoid presentations that are essentially credential shows — they tell you little about how the agency thinks.
Select your preferred agency based on scored evaluations and reference checks. Enter contract negotiations with clear objectives on fee structure, transparency provisions, performance incentives, audit rights, and termination terms. Communicate the outcome to all agencies. Begin transition planning with the appointed agency before contracts are signed.
The quality of your RFP directly determines the quality of agency responses. A vague or poorly structured brief produces generic responses that are difficult to evaluate. A well-crafted RFP sets the conditions for agencies to demonstrate genuine strategic thinking.
Pro tip: Hold a briefing call or meeting with all shortlisted agencies at the same time after issuing the RFP. This ensures all agencies receive the same information, allows you to clarify any ambiguities, and signals that you are running a fair and professional process — which attracts better quality responses.
Great pitch evaluation uses a structured scoring framework agreed before any agency presentations. This reduces the risk of recency bias, relationship influence, or the most impressive presenter winning regardless of substance.
Does the agency demonstrate a genuine understanding of your business, category, and competitive context? Is the proposed strategy differentiated and grounded in evidence, or generic and safe?
Are the team members who will actually work on your account (not just the new business directors who pitch) experienced, credible, and engaged? Can they demonstrate relevant sector experience?
What proprietary tools, data assets, or technology platforms does the agency offer, and are they genuinely differentiated? How will they improve planning quality, buying efficiency, or measurement accuracy?
Is the proposed fee structure clear, competitive, and aligned with your interests? What transparency provisions are they willing to accept? Are they comfortable with audit rights and honest about their commercial model?
Does the agency's culture and approach align with yours? How do they handle disagreement, bad news, and difficult conversations? Will the working relationship be productive over a multi-year period?
* Suggested weightings. Adjust to reflect your specific priorities — for example, a business undergoing digital transformation may weight technology higher; a brand where culture fit has historically been a problem may weight that criterion more heavily.
These mistakes appear repeatedly in poorly managed pitches. Awareness of them is the first step to avoiding them.
Inviting eight or ten agencies to the full pitch stage is wasteful for everyone and produces lower-quality responses. Agencies know when a pitch is unwinnable and invest accordingly. Limit full pitches to three to five agencies maximum.
If agencies are unclear on what they are pitching for — which channels, which markets, what fee model, what team structure — they will make their own assumptions, and responses will be incomparable. Invest time in the brief.
Selecting primarily on fee tends to attract agencies that have cut corners on talent, tools, or process to win the work. The agency fee is typically 3–8% of total media spend — optimising the 5% whilst neglecting the 95% is poor economics.
Written presentations reveal strategy but not character. Chemistry meetings reveal how the agency thinks under pressure, how they handle questions they do not know the answer to, and whether the team dynamic will work with yours.
Sharing detailed pitch responses with the incumbent, allowing the incumbent to pitch last with knowledge of what others have proposed, or giving the incumbent longer to prepare all compromise the integrity of the process.
Agency-provided referees are self-selecting. Ask for references from clients who left as well as current clients. Ask specific questions about how the agency handled problems, not just how strong performance was.
Many of the problems that emerge in the first months of a new agency relationship are the result of poor transition planning, not agency underperformance. Begin transition planning before contracts are signed.
Fuel Media is a signatory to the Pitch Positive Pledge, an industry-wide initiative to establish fair, respectful, and productive pitch standards across the advertising industry. The Pledge was developed in response to longstanding concerns about pitch processes that were wasteful, opaque, or disrespectful of agency time and resource.
Signatories commit to running pitches that are fair, transparent, and respectful of all participants. Key principles include giving agencies adequate time to respond, providing clear and honest feedback to unsuccessful agencies, not requesting speculative creative work without remuneration, and treating the incumbent agency with respect throughout the process.
When you work with Fuel Media on a pitch, you can be confident the process will meet Pitch Positive Pledge standards. This is not just an ethical position — pitches that follow these principles consistently attract better-quality agency participation and produce better long-term outcomes.
Many advertisers run pitches successfully without independent support. But there are situations where bringing in an independent consultant significantly improves both the process and the outcome.
Fuel Media provides independent pitch management for advertisers running media agency reviews. We manage the full process from initial scoping to contract negotiation, or provide support at specific stages where it is most needed. Get in touch to discuss your situation.
The table below shows a representative 12-week pitch timeline. Complex pitches or those covering multiple markets may require 14–16 weeks. Compressed timelines are possible but involve trade-offs in response quality and evaluation rigour.
| Weeks | Phase | Key Activities |
|---|---|---|
| Week 1–2 | Internal Setup | Brief writing, pitch team assembly, evaluation criteria, longlist research |
| Week 2–3 | RFI Issuance | Issue RFI to 8–12 longlisted agencies, hold Q&A, receive responses |
| Week 4 | Shortlisting | Evaluate RFI responses, select 3–5 agencies, communicate outcomes |
| Week 5–6 | RFP Issuance | Issue full RFP, hold collective briefing call, agency Q&A period |
| Week 7–8 | RFP Response Period | Agencies prepare full pitch responses (allow minimum 3 weeks) |
| Week 9 | Chemistry Meetings | 60–90 minute sessions with each agency team, team assessments |
| Week 10–11 | Pitch Presentations | Half-day presentations, structured Q&A, panel scoring |
| Week 11–12 | Evaluation and Selection | Score consolidation, reference checks, preferred agency selection |
| Week 12–14 | Contracting | Contract negotiation, commercial terms, transition planning, appointment |
A well-run media agency pitch typically takes 12–16 weeks from initial brief to appointment. Rushing the process is one of the most common mistakes advertisers make: it limits the quality of agency responses, reduces the time available for proper evaluation, and can result in poor decisions on appointments that will govern millions of pounds of spend for three to five years. Allowing adequate time is consistently associated with better outcomes.
We recommend a two-stage process: a longer RFI longlist of eight to twelve agencies, reduced to a shortlist of three to five for the full RFP and pitch presentations. Inviting too many agencies to the full pitch stage creates significant resource demands on both sides, reduces the quality of responses, and makes evaluation unwieldy. Three to four agencies at the final pitch stage is the industry sweet spot for most advertisers.
For advertisers spending £5 million or more annually on media, an independent pitch consultant typically pays for itself many times over. The benefits include access to a comprehensive and up-to-date agency market knowledge, a structured and defensible process, protection from agency lobbying and relationship pressure, and expert evaluation of technical proposals that internal teams may lack the specialist knowledge to assess. For smaller advertisers, the calculation is more nuanced — we are happy to advise on whether independent support is warranted for your specific situation.
You are not obligated to inform your incumbent agency at the outset, though most advertisers do so out of courtesy and to maintain the relationship during the review period. We recommend informing the incumbent at the point the RFI is issued. Keeping them in the dark until they see the RFI from their industry contacts creates unnecessary damage to the relationship and is generally considered poor practice. The Pitch Positive Pledge, of which Fuel Media is a signatory, includes principles around respectful incumbent treatment.
Yes, in almost all cases. Excluding the incumbent from the pitch is difficult to justify, risks legal challenge if there is a notice period in the contract, and denies you the opportunity to see whether they can raise their game. The incumbent often performs well in repitch situations — they know your business and have a strong incentive to retain the account. A clean, competitive pitch with the incumbent participating is usually the right approach.
The transition period is as important as the pitch itself. A well-managed transition protects your media investments, preserves campaign continuity, and sets the new agency up for success. Key steps include a formal handover of all data, creative assets, platform access, and contractual information; a structured onboarding programme for the new agency; clear 90-day objectives for the new relationship; and a governance framework for ongoing performance management. We support clients through transition as part of our pitch management service.
Complete guide to understanding media audits: types, process, methodology, and what to expect.
Read moreUK pricing guide covering typical fees, pricing factors, and ROI calculations for media audits.
Read moreHidden costs, rebates, and how to ensure complete transparency in your media investment.
Read more